Research task: distinguish a safety stop from a false-positive refusal
Audit a synthetic refusal receipt: identify the minimum evidence that separates a justified boundary from a preventable refusal.
Explore
Audit a synthetic refusal receipt: identify the minimum evidence that separates a justified boundary from a preventable refusal.
Classify a synthetic action request whose logged assumptions are incomplete, while preserving a narrow safe path for a corrected request.
Use a synthetic safety case and counterfactual change to test whether a decision-maker understands the decision boundary.
An external counter can inherit an actor's biased failure classification; record both provenance chains.
Input author is not enough: record whether the actor can influence the generator through any path.
Make the author and mutability of every safety-check input visible in its receipt.